There is no good reason to frame the question in that way and no good can come of attempting to have a serious discussion framed around that question. Who did frame the question, and what made them think that was a good way to frame it? I think having reasonably open borders as a default creates fewer problems of apparent injustice against a natural person. It seems obviously better to bring in the foreigner as an assimilating migrant than have him charge in as part of an invading army of conquest.
Within this volume, however, Levitt explores only a few topics to illustrate the kinds of issues that can be addressed using his approach. In stepping outside what are commonly accepted as the boundaries of the field of economics, Levitt actually steps back a century or two into the past.
Before economics was recognized as a discipline in its own right, it was part of what was called political economy, which encompassed both politics and economics, among other areas. Levitt seems to acknowledge this history, at least subtly: The table of contents for Freakonomics recalls a nineteenth century work.
There are no subheadings within chapters, and in fact the material within each chapter blurs together, sometimes leaving the reader wondering how Levitt makes the leap from one topic to another. In fact, it is not always clear who is writing and whose research is being reported.
Before each chapter appears a short excerpt from an article about Levitt written by coauthor Stephen Dubner for the August 3,issue of The New York Times Magazine.
What, then, is Levitt attempting to do with his new field of freakonomics?
He states that he is taking economics back to its basics, as a study of incentives and the ways in which people attempt to get what they want, given that scarcity and competition exist.
Levitt stresses that he is exploring how the world really works, rather than examining issues of morality or how people would like the world to work. The text is markedly nontechnical, with no equations and only a few summaries of data.
Levitt thereby both invites nonspecialists into his field of study and opens his analysis to scrutiny by those who wish to delve deeper. Chapter 1 begins with a brief discourse on incentives. Levitt believes that most incentives do not arise organically; instead, someone had to invent them, with some goal in mind.
This opens the question of whether such artificial incentives actually do achieve their goals. He gives an example of a day-care center faced with the problem that some parents were late picking up their children.
The center decided to levy a small fine each time a child was picked up late. The result was that parental tardiness increased; apparently, parents balanced the small fine against their own inconvenience in being on time and decided that the cost was worth it.
Throughout the book, Levitt stresses that types of incentiveseconomic, social, and moraloften play off or replace one another. The example raises the issue that when rules are set, cheating often follows. Levitt expands on this concept in an The entire section is 1, words. Unlock This Study Guide Now Start your hour free trial to unlock this page Freakonomics study guide and get instant access to the following:The Misconceptions of India - India is the seventh-largest country by area, the second-most populous country with over billion people, and the world's largest/ populated democracy in the world.
A Literary Analysis of Freakonomics by Steven D.
Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner PAGES 4. WORDS View Full Essay. freakonomics, steven d levitt, stephen j dubner, what makes a perfect parent. Not sure what I'd do without @Kibin - Alfredo Alvarez, student @ Miami University. Perserving our Heritage Level 1 Part 1, Moe Ccue C My Box-Spanish 6/Pk, Stone A Visit to the Suez Canal (), T.
K. Lynch Ageing, health and care, Christina R.
Victor Lighthouses and Lifesaving on Washington's Outer Coast, William S Hanable. With their trademark blend of captivating storytelling and unconventional analysis, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J.
Dubner take us inside their thought process and teach us all how to think a bit more productively, more creatively, more rationally/5(K). showing to the generation to come: the praises of the LORD, and his strength: and his wonderful works that he hath done.
Here is a list of my favorite books that I recommend all my friends. You can even grab them at the best prices on my website: Home - Elevanto In a summary of decades worth of research, Kahneman challenges the various cognitive biases people subconsciously possess, and apply day after day.